LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECH-DISCUSS Archives


TECH-DISCUSS Archives

TECH-DISCUSS Archives


TECH-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECH-DISCUSS Home

TECH-DISCUSS Home

TECH-DISCUSS  December 2009

TECH-DISCUSS December 2009

Subject:

Re: network management systems...

From:

Kristofer Pettijohn <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Technical Discussions List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:01:32 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (36 lines)

> > Haven't tried, but I will.
> Please do.

I will probably have some time tonight or tomorrow to try it out.

> I haven't done the WMI stuff yet, the SNMP hasn't been what I expected
> unfortunately :(

Are you getting anything out of SNMP for Windows?  Any filesystem, processes, cpu/memory performance?

> Buddy of mine has the commercial edition and loves it (mostly for the
> python stuff).

I'm trying to convince management to buy the commercial version.  We've hacked the hell out of the core version, like implementing distributed collectors and such.

> I just want something with the basic features of Nagios, without the
> configuration nightmare of it, plus ability to do threshhold
> triggering, and to do this without me having to maintain agents on
> every type of server I have on the network.

Absolutely possible.  That's why we used it, so we didn't have to maintain agents.  Actually, mainly because our servers are validated and we can't install additional software onto them without going through ten headaches.

> Another issue I have is that Nagios seems to be really the only
> monitoring platform with a backoff procedure before firing off an
> alert, and the concept of a service (or host) flapping and suspending
> notifications for such for a short period of time.

If I'm understanding you right, you want a bit of a delay before an alert goes out?
When you set up Alerting Rules, you can say that the minimum count is a certain value.. so everytime it checks and finds that SMTP is down for example, it adds 1 to the count (this is related to its event deduplication thing).  Or you can simply set a delay in minutes, too.. which is useful for giving something a few moments to come back up on its own, or in the case of setting up an escalation procedure to send an alert to someone else if it hasn't been resolved after X minutes.

Anyways, I'm downloading the FreeBSD ISO's and will see what I can get into.

-- 
Mike Horwath      ipHouse - Welcome home!       [log in to unmask]
        The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is
        that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2011
May 2011
November 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager