LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECH-DISCUSS Archives


TECH-DISCUSS Archives

TECH-DISCUSS Archives


TECH-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECH-DISCUSS Home

TECH-DISCUSS Home

TECH-DISCUSS  January 2010

TECH-DISCUSS January 2010

Subject:

Re: Qwest FTTN

From:

Matthew Dixon Cowles <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Technical Discussions List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:45:24 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (16 lines)

[Dennis R. Abel]
> Those subscribers did not have a business account and there
> agreement states the rules about the service. They had home
> subscriber accounts which do not allow web and mail servers. For a
> few dollars more and a business account those ports are open and
> are never blocked.

I assume that you're referring only to blocking port 25, not forging
RST packets or enforcing a secret transfer limit.

And I'll agree somewhat sadly that there's an argument in favor of
blocking port 25 for people who wouldn't know if it was blocked or
not.

Regards,
Matt

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2011
May 2011
November 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager