On 8/31/11 19:31 CDT, Richard Laager wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:26 -0500, Mike Horwath wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
>>> I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via
>>> MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this
>>> network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across
>>> one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by
>>> choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via
>>> MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best
>>> person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering
>>> contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I
>>> realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or
>>> two deeper.
>>
>> Zayo (old Onvoy) network.
>>
>> Didn't we see something like this before when UMN connected things up
>> with Zayo not accepting the route updates/insertions?
>
> FWIW: I'm seeing another possible problem the opposite way. I'm a
> customer of Zayo and my routes to minnesota.edu go through the UMN, but
> the return traffic goes to Zayo via Level3.

Can you give me a prefix?

The only routes I'm seeing from Zayo that I'm not accepting are ones
that I have a better route to through MICE or a GigaPOP participant.
Also, I'm not seeing any routes from AS33362 that are going via Level3,
Cogent, TWTC, TransitRail or Internet2 CPS, our upstream Transit providers.

Thanks
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email:[log in to unmask]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1