> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Richard Laager <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2015 01:39 PM, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>> You can see here that the reporting claims it’s 1M
>>
>> http://micelg.usinternet.com/export/graph_385.html
>
> Even if it was polling at 1 minute (which from other messages in this thread, we seem to think it isn't), that's just for the hourly graph. The daily graph is unambiguously claiming 5 minute averages.
>
> In light of that, is this still a problem?
>
It wasn’t really a problem more than a curiosity. Even if it was polling at 1m, as long as the statistics collection method is noted clearly and publicly it’s shouldn’t be a big deal.
Best,
-M<
|