Same boat here as well.
Jeff Anderson
[log in to unmask]
612.799.7277 Cell
612.339.8255 x200 Office
612.339.3310 Fax
-----Original Message-----
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 9:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Update for Akamai (AS 20940) < > MICE
Has anyone heard back from [log in to unmask] ? It has been almost 2 weeks, my bi-lateral peering request has gone unanswered, and the session I built for them is not established. I know Marty mentioned they were working on some things, however I have not even gotten a reply acknowledging my emails.
Jeremy
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hannigan, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Update for Akamai (AS 20940) < > MICE
Greetings everyone. And Reid. :-)
Our implementation is proceeding and we’re projecting that we’ll be moving bits back to the exchange in the next few weeks.
Unfortunately, we’re dropping our route server sessions permanently. Everyone who is now route server only will need to established bi lateral peering. Send your peering request to [log in to unmask] with the requisite details (ASN, peer addresses). If you had a direct session previously, we have not forgotten it and there’s no need to restate. Traffic will return slowly, first with our SSL bits and then full on edge a few weeks after that.
Thanks for your patience and for helping to build a better Internet in MSP.
Best,
Martin Hannigan // AS 20940 // AS 32787
________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
|
