LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MICE-DISCUSS Archives


MICE-DISCUSS Archives

MICE-DISCUSS Archives


MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MICE-DISCUSS Home

MICE-DISCUSS Home

MICE-DISCUSS  September 2016

MICE-DISCUSS September 2016

Subject:

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

From:

Jason Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:45:55 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (153 lines)

Please allocate ge-2/0/0 to route server 2. There is no change in IP address.

I'm blocked from announce. Can someone else get the notification
together for the announce list?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I will donate one
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 3:33 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants
>
> Do we have a copper SFP for the Route Server connection?
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Jay,
>>
>>
>>
>>                 Can we get new port assignments for the 4 1G optical ports
>> on the 4200 to move them to the 4550.  Also I would propose plugging one of
>> the route servers into the 4500 to spread them across 2 stacks, so if you
>> agree, please assign a port for that as well.  Also if you have permission,
>> can you post the maintenance to the Announce list?
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ryan
>> Goldberg
>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:07 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G
>> Participants
>>
>>
>>
>> No sfp slots available on the 4200.   It can only run the two 10g...
>>
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Matthew Beckwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Jeremy, Thanks for your efforts on this.
>>
>> Personally, i'm fine with next Tuesday afternoon. I think the general
>> consensus was mid-day maintenance is fine, provided we send out something to
>> MICE-ANNOUNCE (probably by the end of the day today) so people can shut down
>> their sessions in advance if they prefer.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't remember...did we decide if we're moving the 1G Optical folks on the
>> existing 4200 expansion module (5 Nines, ClaimLynx, CDW/Berbee, Velocity
>> Telephone) to the 4550?
>>
>>
>>
>> ~Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> As many of you know after Tuesday's meeting, I moved my connection over to
>> the new 4200 that was donated by Compudyne.  The topology is that the
>> existing three switches are connected together in a ring with Juniper
>> stacking cables, and then the new 4200 that I am testing has 2 10G ports
>> lagged to the existing switches, one of which goes to the 4500, and the
>> other goes to the 4550.  When I initially connected, I was seeing loss to
>> all three of the older switches.  The loss was 0.4% to the 4500, and 0.2% to
>> the 4200, and the 4550.  I then shutdown the LAG port that ran between the
>> 4550, and the new 4200.  The new loss numbers over a 6 hour period came back
>> as 0% to the 4500 and 4200, and 0.2% to the 4550.  I then switched it so
>> that only the port to the 4550 was active in the LAG group, and the loss
>> changed to 0.3% to the 4500, 0.2% to the 4200, and 0% to the 4550.  I
>> believe this clearly points to the loss being in the stacking of the
>> existing switches.  My suggested next step would be to schedule a
>> maintenance window where the existing members are moved from the old 4200 to
>> the new one, and the LAG port from the new 4200 to the 4550 is left
>> shutdown.  This will enable the existing 4200 users to experience less loss,
>> while we can see if removing the old 4200, and associated stacking cables
>> has removed the loss from the existing stack.  Because of my limited
>> availability I am proposing doing the maintenance next Tuesday afternoon.
>> Let me know if this works, or if someone else with better availability would
>> rather do it.  It should only briefly effect the 1G members, and not the 10G
>> users.  I plan on moving the route servers one at a time leaving plenty of
>> time for BGP to re-establish prior to moving the second one.
>>
>>
>> Jeremy Lumby
>> Minnesota VoIP
>> 9217 17th Ave S
>> Suite 216
>> Bloomington, MN 55425
>> Main: 612-355-7740 x211
>> Direct: 612-392-6814
>> EFax: 952-873-7425
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>
>
>
> --
> Jay Hanke
> CTO
> Neutral Path Communications
> 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204
> Mankato, MN 56001
> (507) 327-2398 mobile
> [log in to unmask]
> www.neutralpath.net



-- 
Jay Hanke
CTO
Neutral Path Communications
3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204
Mankato, MN 56001
(507) 327-2398 mobile
[log in to unmask]
www.neutralpath.net

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager