LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MICE-DISCUSS Archives


MICE-DISCUSS Archives

MICE-DISCUSS Archives


MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MICE-DISCUSS Home

MICE-DISCUSS Home

MICE-DISCUSS  November 2016

MICE-DISCUSS November 2016

Subject:

Re: MN VoIP Remote Switch Request

From:

Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:12:00 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (45 lines)

To further add to Anthony's comments, I plan on keeping the MICE access portion of the remote switch completely free even if MICE starts charging port fees on the main switch.

-----Original Message-----
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MN VoIP Remote Switch Request

> Cologix's suite 100 in the 511 Building.

In this respect Jeremy's plan is similar to the CNS and Mankato Networks remote switches, which are both within a few dozen feet of the main switch stack.  I can certainly picture that potential members who were quite small would need to carefully weigh the cost of a dedicated main switch cross connect, especially in the beginning when the value-add is unknown.

If I put my "guy counting the traffic" hat on I'd like to be able to enumerate the individual member's links, but understand that if their switch port is used for multiple things breaking out MICE traffic will be problematic so we'd need to just count the aggregate uplink in/out traffic.  That's what we do with the Mankato Networks remote switch today.

With my MICE tech hat on we've said that if a participant was causing trouble behind a remote switch we didn't have access to we'd cut off the remote switch's uplink if we were unable to get ahold of the remote switch operator.    That's the situation with the Neutral Path and CNS remote switches today (not that we've ever had trouble with them.)

So my $0.02 would be that as we've grown we've struggled with how to keep costs reasonable for smaller members, and that this provides them with one more option to participate - so it's all good.

Cheers,
anthony

Anthony Anderberg
Sr. Systems Analyst
320-234-5239
[log in to unmask]
www.nutelecom.net

-----Original Message-----
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MN VoIP Remote Switch Request

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Richard Laager <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> The switch would be operated by MN VoIP. It would be located in
> Cologix's suite 100 in the 511 Building.

Given this switch would be located in 511, would more new members be enabled to more easily connect by having this remote switch in place, beyond just MN VoIP? If so, how many? Or is there some additional transport/regional areas you are opening up for access to MICE by having this in place?

Otherwise, I’m struggling to see much value in having yet another switch at 511.

--
Andrew Hoyos
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager