Well articulated, as always, David. Thank you.
I am in favor of the use of static MAC ACL, even if that requires manual
changes to that ACL, and the additional coordination that may consume.
A few thoughts, though....
Maybe 1G links are exempt from this? Since a couple second switching
loop from a 1G port is not as impactful? ????? Thoughts from others,
please.
Using a static MAC ACL could make troubleshooting a failure more
problematic. For example, replacing a line card to "see if that fixes
the issue" could send a tech down a trail of red hearings. Even if the
member is fully aware that they need to coordinate the MAC change, this
sort work is often being done in response to an unexpected outage. The
added time spend on the coordination could be seen as frustrating. But,
for some members it's not a big deal, and can use other links until
their MICE connectivity is restored.
I've heard that some members are using a virtual MAC address, which is
probably the way to avoid needing to coordinate in the first place.
|