Can't folks just specify which IRR in their IRR entry if desired? Ie
ARIN::AS1234
FWIW we only use RADB but are fine if the common IRR's (but not legacy
arin) are used.
Also is there any reason at all to use non-ARIN teritory IRR data? Do
any MICE participants have anything in RIPE for example?
--Chris
On 5/11/23 10:01, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
> External
>
> I do not see a need for per participant IRR, I would rather that they
> all just default to your example below.
>
> *From:*MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of
> *Richard Laager
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:58 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IRR Mandatory at MICE / New Route Servers
>
> On 2023-05-09 14:01, August Yang wrote:
>
> Should I reorder RADB,ARIN to be ARIN,RADB?
>
> Definitely. We have objects registered in all databases feasible to
> prevent AS-SET squatting, which has occurred in the past, while only
> RADB has the actual members listed. Turns out correct prefix list
> can be generated using bgpq4 regardless of the order, so it's better
> to prioritize authenticated sources.
>
> In thinking about this some more... Is IXP Manager's behavior of
> per-participant IRR sources actually useful? In other words, what's
> wrong with just setting everyone to:
> ARIN,RIPE,LACNIC,APNIC,AFRINIC,RADB,LEVEL3?
>
> --
>
> Richard
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
> <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
> <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
>
--
Chris Wopat
Network Engineer, WiscNet
[log in to unmask] 608-210-3965
|