 |
 |
[Doug] > But still, many things break in NAT still without special > provisions (ie. SIP, H.323, etc. etc) that they aren't going to > allow in a carrier-wide NAT setup. So it might end up as a two-tier thing, with most people behind NAT and some people paying more for a routable address. > We'll have to see what kind of routing is like, or if we only have > people on the coasts to talk to anyway. I'd be interested to know what it looks like. > Colo and the like is pretty straight forward for IPv6 setup. DSL, > not so much. So it's possible to get IPV6 packets anywhere but to the end user. Regards, Matt