On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:23:48AM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> Some of us are organizing to rectify the situation ASAP. There are
> some workarounds that could help in the very short-term...
Specificly one thing that could be done is if SDN could be moved from
the 4500 onto the 3560, and FWR could string another cross-connect
temporarily between the 3560 and the other fiber "uplink" port on the
4500, we could change those two gig ports into an Etherchannel.
This would move the biggest destination of the Akamai traffic closer
to the source, as well as preventing one endpoint from swamping the
interconnect..
Even if SDN could be moved to the 3560 would do a lot to alleviate the issue.
--
Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]>
-- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS --
Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
