Print

Print


On 05/19/2011 07:58 AM, Mitch Elfstrand wrote:
> SDN is willing to move the connection to alleviate the issue. Please let us know if we need to send someone to 511 to help with anything.
>

That sounds like this might be an ideal short-term fix.  Feel free to
plug into Gig 0/2 on the CNS switch.  We didn't leave any optics down
there, you will need to provide a Cisco (or compatible) SFP. 
Alternatively, you could consider doing a 10Gig connection.  Your peak
was almost 600Mbps last night!  If you want to do 10Gig, you'll need X2
optics for the CNS switch.  Let me know and I'll assign a 10Gig port.

CNS will donate use of 10Gig LR optics to MICE for use in the CNS switch
to connect to the Juniper switch.  Unfortunately, those optics are in
Bemidji.  I will check to see if anybody here is going to the Cities
today, if so I will send the optics with them, if not, I will overnight
them to Mike Hemphill at FWR.  (Mike, I hope that is OK with you).

Thanks,
   Steve





> Regards,
>
> Mitch Elfstrand | Director of Network Engineering
> [log in to unmask] | 2900 W 10th St. | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 USA
> Direct +1.605.978.3587 | Mobile +1.605.212.3392 | TF +1.800.247.1442 | Fax +1.605.334.4782
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:54 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Akamai Traffic on MICE
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:23:48AM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
>> Some of us are organizing to rectify the situation ASAP. There are
>> some workarounds that could help in the very short-term...
> Specificly one thing that could be done is if SDN could be moved from
> the 4500 onto the 3560, and FWR could string another cross-connect
> temporarily between the 3560 and the other fiber "uplink" port on the
> 4500, we could change those two gig ports into an Etherchannel.
>
> This would move the biggest destination of the Akamai traffic closer
> to the source, as well as preventing one endpoint from swamping the
> interconnect..
>
> Even if SDN could be moved to the 3560 would do a lot to alleviate the issue.
>
> --
> Doug McIntyre                            <[log in to unmask]>
>           -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS --
>        Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>
> ***This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited -- Please immediately and permanently delete.***
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1