On 5/25/11 2:24 PM, "Steve Howard" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>On 05/25/2011 02:15 PM, Mike Horwath wrote:
>> On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote:
>>>>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the
>>>>>> 64-bit counters?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data
>>>>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2?
>>>> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port
>>>> Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime
>>>>this
>>>> creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot.
>>> Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing
>>> interfaces from port channels.
>>>
>>> Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the
>>> config, as you might be polling something else too.
>> Shit, that's a great point!
>>
>> We aways have that set.
>>
>> Steve, can you check that?
>>
>> Could very well be a different port now :(
>>
>> But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into
>>things
>> further.
>>
>
>It was not there. It is now.
Super duper, I'll have it 'rescan' things.
Hope it donut scrwed up things!
--
Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! [log in to unmask]
The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is
that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
