 |
 |
On 10/27/11 7:07 PM, "David Farmer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 10/27/11 13:55 CDT, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:49:36PM -0500, Hannigan, Martin wrote: >>> It's not offline. Our NOC inadvertently shut it off after I had >>> asked them to simply place a cap on the amount of capacity it would >>> push. That was fixed this morning. I would've seen it sooner myself, >>> but I'm in Senegal at the moment. >> >> So this had nothing to do with USI then? >> >> I am still pretty confused. >> >> I have 2 reasons right now for outage: >> >> USI has a proposal into Akamai regarding> > The amount of transit necessary for cache fill is more the USI was told > and is causing some congestion for them. It shouldn't be anymore as I had the cap "fixed" and adjusted to the expected amount. If it's still an issue, I haven't heard it so let me know. [ clip ] >> >> If that's the case, what is the cap? > > There isn't a cap but there was congestion. > There is a cap on my side at the moment and it's 1.25 Gb/s. With respect to settled numbers, we're settled. Our system reacts to changes typically within 48 hours. We usually see more use when things get more local for a variety of reasons. Best, -M< ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1