So if that is the case, a carrier can"t commit to just 100Mbps because they'd have to expect traffic levels to increase somewhat equally accross all contributing carriers and the only way it would stay lower would be if more carriers started contributing, correct?

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jay Hanke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

You would allow the akamai block out to your upstreams.

I think the balancing magic would be to have several carriers open up 1 upstream spreading the load.

On Oct 30, 2011 11:26 AM, "Mike Horwath" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Provider independent addressing would sure be fun here...

So, let's say I wanna pump in some bandwidth, how do I?

Assume I'm an idiot.

--
Mike Horwath via iPad 2, electric boogaloo!
########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1