 |
 |
Can we revisit the whole spanning tree on the IX thing again? My two cents last time was for 1 mac address per participant facing port, proper storm control limts, bpdufilter, etc. Also, I'd encourage all participants to review their config's, *especially* if they have layer2 devices in the mix somewhere. AMS-IX has put together very nice and self-explainatory guides about how to keep your layer2 devices acting nice and not have a negative effect on the entire MICE IX. That configuration guide is located here: http://www.ams-ix.net/config-guide -- Andrew Hoyos [log in to unmask] On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Eric Crist wrote: > Judging by the graphs, it was something between Cooperative Net and HE… > > --- > Eric F Crist > System Administrator > ClaimLynx, Inc > (952) 593-5969 x2301 > > > > On Nov 22, 2011, at 13:54:12, James Stahr wrote: > >> Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our ASR as well. >> >> -James >> Berbee/CDW >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1