On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:21:17PM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
> Just a suggestion: would it make more sense for each of the folks
> providing space/power for the switches to provide a /29 or /31 for
> OOB management, rather than inband management within the MICE
> subnet?
>
> That way, it's kinda separated, and nobody has to worry about static
> routing stuff different places, or distributing the IX subnet
> itself.
>
> IX subnet = IX participant routers only then
SUSPENSE IS KILLING ME!
:)
I'd be happy to provide the switch subnetting requirements for OOB
(for switches that have OOB that is).
but anyone else can take the helm on that as well.
--
Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! [log in to unmask]
The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is
that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
