On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:21:17PM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
> Just a suggestion: would it make more sense for each of the folks providing space/power for the switches to provide a /29 or /31 for OOB management, rather than inband management within the MICE subnet?
FWIW: The juniper switch stack is already that way, we push down a
small routable block that 216.250.183.11 is in.
--
Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]>
-- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS --
Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
