 |
 |
We're not a telco or ISP, but we use LAG internally for switch trunks, we've found it to work well, generally. --- Eric F Crist System Administrator ClaimLynx, Inc (952) 593-5969 x2301 On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:54:06, Frank Bulk wrote: > Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to connect for Ethernet circuits? > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:44 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use > > I've been working with our state's telco coop to enhance our Ethernet circuit redundancy. (This is not for Internet circuits, but Ethernet circuits like wireless backhaul). The coop doesn't do a lot of LAG today, except for large customers that have purchased many circuits. Since our transport gear has that capability and we have the ports we'd like to do it, too. To help bolster our case, we're looking for examples where tier 1/2 carriers do LAG with their customers. > > Can anyone on this list share (on or off list) some examples)? > > Frank > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1