On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:13:49PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I would not want to see the 10G customers subsidizing free 1G
> connections. I have no problem with the idea of $150/10G (though
> many would likely prefer an annual $1,800). However, I would suggest
> that if you are charging $150/10G, at least $20/1G ($240/1G/yr)
> would also be appropriate. (IIRC, the 10G ports are not 10x the cost
> of the 1G ports and there's some amount of overhead for maintaining
> the account, etc. This would also serve as somewhat of an incentive
> for people to move to 10G instead of multiple 1G ports which I think
> is better for the exchange and its participants.
I've always thought the idea of charging for the 1Gbps ports to be
something that should be done but originally I was in the minority.
Free is cool too, though :)
--
Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! [log in to unmask]
The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is
that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
