 |
 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > merlyn > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 12:59 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IP address changes > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:41:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > > I vaguely remember someone from the iphouse mentioning that they were > going to add secondary IP addresses to the route servers during the > outage. Just wondering if this has happened since I can only ping them on > their original addresses. > > That was Mike who is out of town this week, and the schedule of the > changeover took he and I unprepared as well. > > There, I've gone ahead and did the IPv4 entries to be 206.108.255.1 & > 206.108.255.2 since the general consensys is to keep the same IPv4 last > octet. > > Nobody should be announcing prefixes with the next hop of > 206.108.255.x yet though. > Was there consensus on v6 addressing scheme? 2001:504:27::/48 was the assigned block. Are we keeping the same last hextet here as well? Andy ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1