 |
 |
Please take a look at http://www.netnod.se/ix/statistics, to see how they do it. This is what we are planning to model off of. Reid On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Richard Laager <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 21:05 -0500, Reid Fishler wrote: > > > Because the ports are currently labeled, we will allow allow members, > > upon request, to move to another port at the time that they remove the > > identity from their port. > > You're saying that Akamai can move to another port and we won't put a > name on that port's graph? Wouldn't it be really obvious that the > unlabeled graph that's just started sending/receiving traffic is the one > network (Akamai) that just disappeared from the set of labeled graphs? > > Plus, until there's another network that opts out, it's still obvious > which port is Akamai. And if that network isn't of a similar size, even > then it still be obvious. > > I don't see any reason to move (or unlabel) anything. If you want to > grant these requests, just stop showing Akamai's port's graph to the > guest user in Cacti and remove it from the weathermap. > > Access to the Cacti admin interface should be along the same lines as > access to manage the actual MICE switches: it's privileged and comes > with discretion requirements. Not every member has access to the > switches' management interface(s) nor Cacti admin today. I have neither, > for example. > > -- > Richard > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1