Board,
I haven't heard anything back on this. Can someone let me know where we intend to go with this?
Best,
-M<
On Dec 6, 2013, at 1:15 AM, "Hannigan, Martin" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> In no discussion was there a statement about this.
>
> We would simply ask to opt out.
>
> Best,
>
> Marty
>
>
>
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 19:28, "David Farmer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/5/13, 18:47 , Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Anthony Anderberg
>>> <[log in to unmask]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just so we're all clear:
>>>> The public graph is the aggregate graph that gets exported and linked
>>>> from our home page. It's a stacked graph where everyone's piece is
>>>> the same green color, partially for simplicity but mostly to obscure
>>>> the details.
>>>> The graph Frank posted is a similar stacked graph, but I've broken the
>>>> traffic out a little (also its ingress vs egress as a way of checking
>>>> accuracy.) This graph and the more detailed weathermap are password
>>>> protected, although admittedly the password is not particularly robust.
>>>> As Steve mentioned over the course of a couple UG meetings we'd
>>>> decided that members should be able to see the exchange's traffic
>>>> patterns, as they say sunlight can cure a great many things.
>>>
>>> We weren't present at the UG's and I don't recall a list discussion. I
>>> don't recall being asked. It's non-standard for an IXP to do this. It
>>> should be opt in. I'd certainly like to opt out please.
>>>
>>>> To the original question, it looks like a number of us are up this
>>>> week – I was thinking it might be holiday shopping.
>>>> If anyone is on from Enventis they might want to consider upgrading
>>>> their port, looks like it's almost at capacity in the evening hours.
>>>
>>>
>>> If these are supposed to be behind lock and key, we failed.
>>>
>>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1312&L=MICE-DISCUSS&F=&S=&P=1337
>>> I'm not logged into anything and that's in the clear.
>>
>> Marty,
>>
>> There have been several discussions with the subject of stats, cacti
>> graphs, etc on the list, since you subscribed in late 2011. So, it
>> shouldn't be a complete surprise. But, I'll agree there wasn't a direct
>> discussion of what graphs and statistics should be kept discussed on the
>> list.
>>
>> And, yes, it may have been bad form for Frank to post a graph on the
>> mailing list since it has a public archive. But, there is a basic
>> password on the graphs themselves.
>>
>> So, that brings up a few things it wouldn't hurt to discuss;
>>
>> 1. Should the list archive be public?
>>
>> 2. If not, what security should the list archive have?
>>
>> 3. What graphs and statistics should be collected?
>>
>> 4. Who should have access to what graphs and statistics?
>>
>> 5. What is the proper security for the graphs and statistics?
>>
>> 6. What is the proper etiquette regarding these graphs and statistics?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> ================================================
>> David Farmer Email: [log in to unmask]
>> Office of Information Technology
>> University of Minnesota
>> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
>> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
>> ================================================
>>
>> ########################################################################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
