 |
 |
Sounds like Reid is already on this. Their tipping point is 1Gbps of cachable traffic to Google. We're doing 200Mbps ourselves so I'd guess MICE would easily tip the scales. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Russell Berg <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Some MICE peers already have Google (and other) caches, so you may have to > poll to see who would be participating in a Google cache at MICE to get > more accurate bandwidth measurements. > > Russ > Airstream Communications > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Brady Kittel > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest? > > Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I > filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster > for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to > connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable > content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. > Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1