 |
 |
We will add it to the agenda again, it's been tabled the last several times as we've been working towards the non-profit status. To date, we've, as a group, chosen to rely on donations to meet needs. s *Shaun Carlson*Senior Manager of Information Technology | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: [log in to unmask] On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Justin Krejci <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Has there been any serious push to institute a fee associated with > connecting to MICE? > If not, can it be put on the agenda for the board to sort out/implement? > If not, can we do a referendum? (too lazy ATM to read if by-laws even > allow a referendum) >> If not, well it's been good while it lasted > > > I think MICE revenue generation (pre or post acquisition of IRS non-profit > status) should be top priority at this point in time. > > > ________________________________________ > From: MICE Discuss [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Mike > Horwath [[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:11 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Googling on IPv6 and HE to 20G > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:08:02AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > > > Virtual Chassis backplane is only 128Gbps (2x64Gbps), which seems > > like alot, but given how much of traffic the exchange is doing,> > > could quickly become an oversubscribed bottleneck. > > Or just move to 4550's at $9K each + cables for 256Gbps (2x128Gbps) > stacking, and even add in the QSFP module for 40Gbps additional > capacity. > > This is all resolvable with money - money from port fees would have > covered this. > > Poking the dead-horse that really is alive and kicking. > > Leading from behind! I am Hindmost, back-seat driver, and overall > captain obvious.. > > -- > Mike Horwath, reachable via [log in to unmask] >