 |
 |
Marty- This would be great in an ideal world with free bandwidth, fiber and equipment...and if there were tons of additional colos in a market like MSP. As far as I know MSP isn't NOVA. Reid On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Hannigan, Martin <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Steve Howard <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > On 12/05/2014 03:01 PM, Hannigan, Martin wrote: > >> On Dec 5, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Reid Fishler <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> > >>> We covered this in a couple of our last meetings. There is a full > Onvoy/Zayo facility. There isn't much interest there as its full, and its > mostly voice carriers there. There is a Viawest facility opening, but Shaw > has that covered. There is a facility that houses most of the Canadian > carriers, but they aren't interested in peering. > >> So ViaWest and Zayo don't want to compete? I'll make a few calls and > check on that. > >> > > > > Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but what benefit would MICE gain > > or what problem is this trying to solve ? > > I'd like to have at least one or two more places to tap into the IXP from > so that I can use it as leverage when I negotiate space and power with all > of you. Especially for PNIs which is on the horizon. > > When an IXP grows, it make sense to peel off traffic vs. leave it all on > the exchange. A variety of reasons including cost. In fact, if a fee were > to be implemented for ports you'd probably see some of that happen with > more frequency than you do now. But when I do that, I want choices and I > want to still be able to connect. Cake. Ice Cream. Save Money. > > > Best, > > -M< > > > -- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178