 |
 |
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 07:32:00PM -0600, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > I think the low port count means that we need a switch sooner rather > than later. I know there is a formal proposal in the works, however > another 4500 may be the quick solution, and if we look at it from > the viewpoint of if all of our current traffic had to flow between > switches, we would not max it out, so another switch could buy us > some time, while still being able to utilize most of the ports > before any real bandwidth limitations. I think a call for > donations/optional bill would draw in far more than enough cash. 4500 can be had on eBay for $9k Get the stack cables and be set. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via [log in to unmask]