On 05/18/2016 12:03 PM, Chris Wopat wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">On 05/18/2016 11:53 AM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
Would you want the export function to
clear any communities it had at the end? (Something that is NOT done
right now).

Yes, I would consider it standard practice to clear action communities after the action was taken so they don't propagate/leak beyond AS 53679.

IX members may wish to filter them on import as well [1]. Both is probably the most sane outcome.

[1] - ras's BGP community presentation is always good to review - https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog40/presentations/BGPcommunities.pdf



Perhaps I don't understand the specific question?  But, I would prefer that the communities not be stripped.  If they are stripped, how would we pass action communities onto other MICE members that require action on their networks?  Perhaps just strip out the 53679:* communities would be a better choice?


To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1