 |
 |
Ill take a look in the queue. Thanks > On May 9, 2016, at 21:09, Andrew Hoyos <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Likewise here, crickets…… > > >> On May 9, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Has anyone heard back from [log in to unmask] ? It has been almost 2 weeks, my bi-lateral peering request has gone unanswered, and the session I built for them is not established. I know Marty mentioned they were working on some things, however I have not even gotten a reply acknowledging my emails. >> >> Jeremy >> >> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hannigan, Martin >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:34 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Update for Akamai (AS 20940) < > MICE >> >> >> Greetings everyone. And Reid. :-) >> >> Our implementation is proceeding and we’re projecting that we’ll be moving bits back to the exchange in the next few weeks. >> >> Unfortunately, we’re dropping our route server sessions permanently. Everyone who is now route server only will need to established bi lateral peering. Send your peering request to [log in to unmask] with the requisite details (ASN, peer addresses). If you had a direct session previously, we have not forgotten it and there’s no need to restate. Traffic will return slowly, first with our SSL bits and then full on edge a few weeks after that. >> >> Thanks for your patience and for helping to build a better Internet in MSP. >> >> Best, >> >> Martin Hannigan // AS 20940 // AS 32787 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1