My suggestion was based on two thoughts:
1) All of the end users pay the same so we don't have different
"classes" of membership or hurt feelings;
2) This methodology increases MICE revenue.
I like your suggestion also. Each methodology has its own
advantages.
On 06/16/2016 02:54 PM, Richard Laager
wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">On
06/16/2016 02:27 PM, Steve Howard wrote:
End users of remote switches pay as above.
Can you elaborate on why you want it this way? As opposed to: the
remote switch operator pays for the MICE ports, and it's their
business how to recover that.