 |
 |
Mathew, We have a server up in 511 and would be interested in looking into assisting however we can. We'll most likely be up in 511 soon. I can keep you informed. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 [log in to unmask] On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Beckwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Levi, > I'm seeing the loss on traffic going from 4200 to 4500. > (Whether it's egress of the 4200 or 4500 ingress, i'm not sure). > > I'm not 100% sure I know what the infrastructure looks like now-- are > there two 4500's? > > As to whether there's loss to one of the "remote" switches, I'm not > sure.... > If one of the Neutral Path/Mankato Networks/ CNS connected participants > would be up for running iperf for a little while, we could find out fairly > quickly. > > ~Matthew > > *Matthew Beckwell* - V.P. - Network Operations > Advanced Integrated Technologies > Office: + > *1.952.829.5511 <1.952.829.5511> x204*E-Mail: [log in to unmask] > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Levi Pederson < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Mathew, >> >> Is the dropped traffic crossing the Exchange from the 4200 to one of the >> other switches or is it random? >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> *Levi Pederson* >> Mankato Networks LLC >> cell | 612.481.0769 >> work | 612.787.7392 >> [log in to unmask] >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Matthew Beckwell <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> I wanted to see if anyone here has any thoughts on a small amount (<1%) >>> of packet loss I've been trying to chase down, specific to the MICE EX4200 >>> switch. >>> >>> Aitech/AS13746 has a 1G copper port on the EX4200 switch. It seems >>> that we're seeing a small amount of outbound packet loss (1G to 10G) >>> going participants outside of the EX4200 switch. >>> >>> I might expect this going from 10G to 1G (inbound for us), but it's the >>> opposite where we see the problem: 1G to 10G participants. >>> >>> Doug at ipHouse (ge-1/0/3 on the EX4200) fired up iperf and we did some >>> testing. They're in the same situation: Loss leaving the EX4200. >>> Specifically, I was testing over to US Internet (xe-0/0/14) but seeing it >>> via Onvoy as well. >>> >>> The iperf test I was running was UDP, bandwidth of 69000, and packet >>> size of 172, running in both directions. Essentially--emulating a G.711 >>> SIP call (which is how I noticed the loss). I tested with no loss in both >>> directions within the EX4200. >>> >>> Doug mentioned: >>> >>> >I pulled the VC chassis stats, but it has nothing for drops or >>> re-transmits for it. >>> >>> Maybe some of our Juniper-centric members have suggestions? It's quite >>> possible it's always been like this-- the loss is small enough that's >>> managed to evade monitoring. I suspect everyone on the EX4200 is affected. >>> >>> ~Matthew >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >