On 09/29/2016 01:26 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> I've bumped up the route servers to 55k for HE's connection. (Normal >> connections are limited to 1k without an override). > > Can we document that here (perhaps with any other relevant technical detail about route-servers… OS/versions/config/etc)? I was not aware of any max-prefix settings on the route-servers. > > http://micemn.net/technical.html Done. I wasn't aware of this limit either. I'm not personally in favor of documenting version numbers. It is likely to get out-of-date, and I don't see the reason. That said, if someone sends the information and we have more ACKs than NAKs, I'll add it. > A peering DB record maybe a good idea here as well, for the route-servers, so folks have a general idea of what to set max-pfx to, etc. > IE: https://peeringdb.com/net/6834 I think this is a great idea. Jay, if you agree, can you set this up? I'm assuming you're managing the existing MICE entry in peeringdb, as I believe you handle the [log in to unmask] email account. -- Richard