 |
 |
I'm not set up in the new peeringdb system for MICE yet. Old system for IX was you send in an email and ask for changes. I'll make the updates as soon as I'm approved. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Richard Laager <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 01:26 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>> I've bumped up the route servers to 55k for HE's connection. (Normal >>> connections are limited to 1k without an override). >> >> Can we document that here (perhaps with any other relevant technical detail about route-servers… OS/versions/config/etc)? I was not aware of any max-prefix settings on the route-servers. >> >> http://micemn.net/technical.html > > Done. I wasn't aware of this limit either. > > I'm not personally in favor of documenting version numbers. It is likely > to get out-of-date, and I don't see the reason. That said, if someone > sends the information and we have more ACKs than NAKs, I'll add it. > >> A peering DB record maybe a good idea here as well, for the route-servers, so folks have a general idea of what to set max-pfx to, etc. >> IE: https://peeringdb.com/net/6834 > > I think this is a great idea. > > Jay, if you agree, can you set this up? I'm assuming you're managing the > existing MICE entry in peeringdb, as I believe you handle the > [log in to unmask] email account. > > -- > Richard -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile [log in to unmask] www.neutralpath.net