On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:30:22PM -0500, James Stahr wrote:
> For MICE though, it would be *great* if one of the route servers could be
> setup with BFD support that way everyone could benefit and withdraw routes
> faster once it was rolled out to both. It still wouldn't insure that A can
> talk directly to B, only bilateral peering can solve that. BIRD appears to
> have a "passive" setting for it too, so it wouldn't try to do BFD unless the
> other side initiated.
So, something like this?
protocol bfd {
interface "bce1" {
min rx interval 20 ms;
min tx interval 50 ms;
idle tx interval 300 ms;
passive;
};
neighbor 206.108.255.3;
neighbor 206.108.255.4;
neighbor 206.108.255.5;
neighbor 206.108.255.6;
neighbor 206.108.255.7;
neighbor 206.108.255.8;
....
}
And then likewise for the IPv6 daemon?
--
Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]>
~.~ ipHouse ~.~
Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades
