 |
 |
On 10/05/2016 07:17 AM, Colin Baker wrote: > Would have to be per session to be useful. I'm not aware of any IXPs > doing BFD on route servers - it's something worth discussing, and it may > be fine with fairly conservative timers, but I suspect members > interested in utilizing BFD will probably also want to set up bilateral > with those peers. I'm wondering if routers support configuring a BFD neighbor separately from a BGP neighbor and then using BFD for next-hop validation. I'm guessing not. So for those of you looking at using BFD, in addition to the bilateral peering, you'd need to filter the routes coming from the route servers and drop those of your BFD peers, right? Otherwise, when your session to the peer goes down, you'd still be hearing their routes from the route server. >> Colin, does Supranet support BFD for both AS4150 and AS5683, or just the >> former? > > 4150. You can actually remove 5683 from the website - it's not > currently connected and we likely won't be bringing it back. I've updated the website. The route servers will need to be updated too, and this frees up 206.108.255.28. -- Richard