 |
 |
I think Jay’s point was that our smaller members have 1G interfaces and we’re talking about the next generation of switch having 100G interfaces. I bet many of us had similar queue experiences with older platforms
during our early 10G migrations, and larger exchanges that are at the 100G level may be seeing queue drops in even modern hardware. So we’ll want to interrogate potential switch vendors and be mindful of the issue. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
Cheers,
anthony
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 7:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes
From the minutes:
“Jay Hanke commented that other exchanges have reported their switch’s internal queues overflowing when there was more than 2 orders of difference in the
traffic volume between the largest and smallest members.“
How do we go about measuring for that?
Frank
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 1:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes
My minutes and attendance log from our last UG meeting are attached.
Cheers,
anthony
Anthony Anderberg
Sr. Systems Analyst
320-234-5239
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1