Print

Print

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Richard Laager <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I'm looking for feedback on a filtering proposal. I propose that, on the
route server, by default, we filter incoming routes to block anything
matching:
_(174|209|286|701|1239|1299|2828|2914|3257|3320|3356|3549|5511|6453|6461|6762|6939|7018|12956)_

We can, of course, create exceptions if necessary. One obvious one is
that HE's connection would need their own AS (6939) removed from the
block list.

This particular list is from here, with 6939 added by me:
https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/Snijders_Everyday_Practical_Bgp.pdf

I'm fine with this.  If we do this, I request that 11537 and 11164 be added to the list as well, these are the Internet2 R&E backbone and commercial peering service respectively, a doubt we, UW-Sysnet, or Wiscnet would leak these, but never say never.  



--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[log in to unmask]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1