Print

Print
If you control the CPE you could also look at DS-Lite. The v4 is tunneled back and then natted. There are open source as well as commercial implementations. 

Your choice is more about where to put the complexity.

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Dave Williams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Was hoping to just do v6 to the client, then translate to v4 on the edge… but dual stack with private v4 would work, just more complex.

 

From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 7:39 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] NAT64/NATPT

 

+1 Dual stack /48 to sub with private v4 on the outside assuming you're out of ipv4.

 

the transition technologies bring in a lot of complexity. 

 

On Feb 10, 2018 7:16 AM, "Mike Horwath" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
> Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on
> what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?

I have only done this via Fortinet gear.

It works.

Query: why not go native?

--
Mike Horwath, reachable via [log in to unmask]

 

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1


To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1




--
Jay Hanke
CTO
Neutral Path Communications
3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204
Mankato, MN 56001
(507) 327-2398 mobile
[log in to unmask]
www.neutralpath.net

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1