 |
 |
Can you post a list and/or communicate with the SP that are not set up for peering and let them either fix it or indicate whether they have any immediate plans to implement IPv6 peering. Maybe make it an onboarding question for new peers - do you intend to peer with the route servers using IPv6 and configure BIRD appropriate for new members? If off document the process to request IPv6 be turned up. Ben Wiechman Director of IP Strategy and Engineering Direct: 320.256.0184 Cell: 320.247.3224 [log in to unmask] 150 Second Street SW | Perham, MN 56573 | arvig.com On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:41:37AM -0500, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > >> I just checked what some of the spew was, and it seems like a large >> majority of it was the pair of RR’s sending out neighbor solicitation >> messages. >> Is there some timers we can adjust on those? >> > > > I think a lot of it is from BIRD6 looking for route peers that aren't > there. > > Traditionally, we've configured up IPv4 & IPv6 dual stack route peers in > the route > servers. > > Doing a tcpdump on the ICMP6 protocol traffic on them, it is all > ICMPv6 ND looking for route peers that aren't configured on the far end. > Should we disable all the IPv6 route peers that people aren't using? > -- > Doug McIntyre <[log in to unmask]> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades >