 |
 |
Agreed on both the passive configuration for the route servers and implementation suggestions. Ben Wiechman Director of IP Strategy and Engineering Direct: 320.256.0184 Cell: 320.247.3224 [log in to unmask] 150 Second Street SW | Perham, MN 56573 | arvig.com On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Michael Hare <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > My 2c is proceed but consider the following > > 1) space out changes the route servers by a day or so. > 2) force reset bgp on the changed route server. > > As someone who has previously screwed up control plane BGP filters (such > that sessions only came up if remove side was active), I believe step #2 > will shake out anyone who has their control plane filters wrong. Not > really MICE's fault per se, but a nice gesture. > > -Michael > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf > >>Of Richard Laager > >>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 12:56 AM > >>To: [log in to unmask] > >>Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Broadcast Traffic > >> > >>On 04/02/2018 11:23 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > >>> I’d vote for passive BGP sessions (v4/v6) on the route servers across > the > >>board, already established or not. Easy solution to the issue at hand > and sane > >>default. “Quiet unless spoken to”. > >> > >>This is what I was thinking too. > >> > >>-- > >>Richard >