Print

Print


Agreed on both the passive configuration for the route servers and implementation suggestions. 


Ben Wiechman
Director of IP Strategy and Engineering
Direct: 320.256.0184
Cell: 320.247.3224

150 Second Street SW | Perham, MN 56573 | arvig.com

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Michael Hare <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
My 2c is proceed but consider the following

1) space out changes the route servers by a day or so.
2) force reset bgp on the changed route server.

As someone who has previously screwed up control plane BGP filters (such that sessions only came up if remove side was active), I believe step #2 will shake out anyone who has their control plane filters wrong.  Not really MICE's fault per se, but a nice gesture.

-Michael

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf
>>Of Richard Laager
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 12:56 AM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Broadcast Traffic
>>
>>On 04/02/2018 11:23 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
>>> I’d vote for passive BGP sessions (v4/v6) on the route servers across the
>>board, already established or not. Easy solution to the issue at hand and sane
>>default. “Quiet unless spoken to”.
>>
>>This is what I was thinking too.
>>
>>--
>>Richard



To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1