 |
 |
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 9:07 PM Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I am in favor of this, especially if we have someone that is experienced > that is willing to help. I would propose that we start with RS#2 and test > for a while, then we can notify people who's prefixes are being rejected > prior to applying to RS#1. I would also propose that at the same time we > set RS#2 to be passive so that it cuts down on the chatter that it is > creating on the exchange waiting for people to connect, or people who have > not yet turned up their v6 sessions. I think this would be a great point > of discussion at the next UG. > Generally, that is the suggested plan, but also set a two or three week deadline between filtering on RS#2 and RS#1, and no white listing execptions either. Yes, we should discuss this on Wednesday. I think it is really important to hear from anyone who doesn't think this is a good idea, and why. Thanks =============================================== David Farmer Email:[log in to unmask] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================