On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 9:07 PM Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I am in favor of this, especially if we have someone that is experienced that is willing to help.  I would propose that we start with RS#2 and test for a while, then we can notify people who's prefixes are being rejected prior to applying to RS#1.  I would also propose that at the same time we set RS#2 to be passive so that it cuts down on the chatter that it is creating on the exchange waiting for people to connect, or people who have not yet turned up their v6 sessions.  I think this would be a great point of discussion at the next UG.


Generally, that is the suggested plan, but also set a two or three week deadline between filtering on RS#2 and RS#1, and no white listing execptions either.

Yes, we should discuss this on Wednesday. I think it is really important to hear from anyone who doesn't think this is a good idea, and why.

Thanks

===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[log in to unmask]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================


To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1