That was my personal opinion too but many years ago the majority opted for the stacked version, we can chew on it again next week if membership wants.
I had actually been creating/exporting two versions of the graph for a long time but the non-stacked one never got referenced so it fell by the wayside during the Arista migration.
The non-stacked graph was similar looking to what the folks at Torix do but with a MICEish color scheme:
https://www.torix.ca/img/torix-day.png
[signature_1212707895]
From: MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of David Farmer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 3:49 PM
To: MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New Years Traffic
I did a Linkedin Post on it
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952
It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now.
The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level.
As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email:[log in to unmask]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
