If you take a look some of the others that publicly report bandwidth levels, as an example:
https://www.seattleix.net/statistics/
https://www.netnod.se/ix-stats/sums/All.html
https://www.torix.ca/traffic-statistics/
https://ix-denver.org/traffic/
http://www.kcix.net/
All seem to be reporting/collecting both in/out, but not stacking them together.
I’d agree that the 500gbps seems “double counted”.
—
Andrew Hoyos
[log in to unmask]
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 3:48 PM, David Farmer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I did a Linkedin Post on it
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952
>
> It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now.
>
> The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level.
>
> As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them.
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask] > wrote:
> Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
>
>
> --
> ===============================================
> David Farmer Email:[log in to unmask]
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
> ===============================================
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
