Print

Print


If you take a look some of the others that publicly report bandwidth levels, as an example:

https://www.seattleix.net/statistics/
https://www.netnod.se/ix-stats/sums/All.html
https://www.torix.ca/traffic-statistics/
https://ix-denver.org/traffic/
http://www.kcix.net/

All seem to be reporting/collecting both in/out, but not stacking them together.

I’d agree that the 500gbps seems “double counted”.

Andrew Hoyos
[log in to unmask]



On Jan 3, 2019, at 3:48 PM, David Farmer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I did a Linkedin Post on it


It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now.

The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level.

As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them.

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.


--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[log in to unmask]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================


To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1




To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1