Print

Print


aiui, anchor's are not meant to be used for b/w testing per se and are to
be used in conjunction with the atlas probes.

the only anchor that i'm aware of that might be MICE attached is at
wikstrom.  there are however a number of atlas probes in the area. (i host
a couple)

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:45 AM Jay Hanke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I think there is an OpenWRT project floating around for network testing.
> That hardware can be had for less than $100.
>
> There is also the RIPE Atlas project that is worth checking out. It looks
> like some MICE members have existing anchors.
>
> *https://atlas.ripe.net/ *
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:33 AM Jeff Wilde <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't that be like a $200+ client solution?  Seems relatively high is
>> the issue or am I looking at it wrong.  I know that Vantage Point is pretty
>> costly when your talking about 100+ or whatever the number is clients.
>>
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Lubitz,
>> Jake (MNIT)
>> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 10:05 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server
>>
>> +1 on the NUC. The Raspi 3B+ USB ports and Ethernet port all share an USB
>> 2.0 bus. So at most, you may see up to 300Mbps of throughput on the Raspi.
>> I've tried iperf and speedtest-cli on the Raspi and never got over 200Mbps
>> on a 1Gbps WAN connection.
>>
>> Jake
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Chris
>> Wopat
>> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 9:50 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server
>>
>> On 2/25/19 9:46 AM, Shaun Carlson wrote:
>> > I was looking at a couple of options for Raspberry Pi, but haven't
>> > built anything yet.  Have you?
>>
>> Pi starting with model 3b+ can link at gigabit, but cannot do anywhere
>> near that speed.
>>
>> If the goal is something small, one would likely have to go with a real
>> x86 based thing, perhaps an intel NUC:
>>
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.intel.com%2Fcontent%2Fwww%2Fus%2Fen%2Fproducts%2Fboards-kits%2Fnuc.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjake.lubitz%40STATE.MN.US%7Cc2e4cf77f1ad48fd219608d69b38e61f%7Ceb14b04624c445198f26b89c2159828c%7C0%7C1%7C636867066011307927&sdata=ozQrker2bPycc4VmX50dfQOwRtuyotBy5dPTqqs1kWY%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Wopat
>> Network Engineer, WiscNet
>> [log in to unmask]   608-210-3965
>>
>
>
> --
> Jay Hanke, President
> South Front Networks
> [log in to unmask]
> Phone  612-204-0000
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
>


-- 
steve ulrich ([log in to unmask]*)