On 1/24/20 8:01 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> This seems reasonable to me -- what is the timeline to IRR filter implementation?
>
I would suspect this would require reaching out to MICE participants to
find their AS-SETs to build IRR off of, which should also help reveal
who is actually using IRR, which irrdb their data is at, and so on.
I would think the best source of this data would be PeeringDB, instead
of MICE generating and maintaining its own list on the participants page.
An API call to MICE's internal id shows the needed data: asn, irr_as_set:
https://www.peeringdb.com/api/net?ix_id=446
It appears that 50 of the 88 participants have irr_as_set defined in
peeringdb, which is a pretty good start ('work' attached as text file)
grep name mice.txt | wc -l
88
grep irr_as_set mice.txt | grep \"\" | wc -l
38
Apologies if methods for this have already been discussed, I didn't dig
in the archives.
Cheers,
--
Chris Wopat
Network Engineer, WiscNet
[log in to unmask] 608-210-3965
