 |
 |
On 4/6/20 5:17 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > This came up in two different conversations in June and January (per > mice-discuss archives) > I think the concern here is that the route servers aren’t doing IRR > filtering of members yet. > I agree 100% with the approach below, but with one caveat - we need to > be filtering members on the route servers first via IRR. > Otherwise, nothing preventing a member from advertising a /32 tagged > with a blackhole community of 8.8.8.8, or another member’s IP address. Nothing is stopping me from announcing 8.8.8.0/24 right now, right? I agree that the IRR filtering is important, but is that absolutely necessary here? -- Richard