 |
 |
On 2023-05-09 14:01, August Yang wrote: > >> Should I reorder RADB,ARIN to be ARIN,RADB? > Definitely. We have objects registered in all databases feasible to > prevent AS-SET squatting, which has occurred in the past, while only > RADB has the actual members listed. Turns out correct prefix list can > be generated using bgpq4 regardless of the order, so it's better to > prioritize authenticated sources. In thinking about this some more... Is IXP Manager's behavior of per-participant IRR sources actually useful? In other words, what's wrong with just setting everyone to: ARIN,RIPE,LACNIC,APNIC,AFRINIC,RADB,LEVEL3? -- Richard